Heatwaves#
Methodology and data overview#
This workflow is designed to help in exploring the local and regional risks presented by heatwaves, and assessing the impact of climate change on the heatwave hazard.
Note
The video does not reflect the current workflow structure. Notebooks have been renamed and/or moved since the recording.
A heatwave is defined by the maximum and minimum daily temperature exceeding a certain threshold for a certain minimum amount of time. Various definitions are used in different methodologies for heatwave risk assessments, and in this workflow, we will explore the heatwave hazard based on several commonly used methodologies. The risk assessment focuses on the health risks presented to vulnerable populations.
Heatwave hazard assessment under climate change#
Heatwave hazard assessment open data products#
There are several applications available online that allow the user to explore heatwave hazards for European regions without the need to perform their own calculations. Below is an overview of such resources. We recommend to explore these resources first, before using the more detailed CLIMAAX workflow.
The resources below provide information on heatwave indicators that are already aggregated to specific locations or regions using a specific methodology. This may not be sufficient for a more detailed assessment, which is why the CLIMAAX workflow is provided - it allows for more flexibility in analyzing the data with the possibility of selecting specific definitions of heatwave events (i.e. the thresholds for temperature and time duration) and defining your area of interest.
Resources available from ClimateAdapt:
CLIMAAX workflow: hazard assessment using EURO-CORDEX climate data#
In the CLIMAAX workflow (in the following pages) we demonstrate how EURO-CORDEX data can be processed to assess heatwave hazard using two different methodologies: EuroHEAT and Xclim. The user can choose to apply one of these methodologies based on their preferred heatwave definition. The methodologies differ in terms of the required input data, temperature thresholds, duration thresholds, computing algorithm, and results.
EuroHEAT defines the heatwave as a period where the maximum apparent and the minimum temperature is over the 90th percentile of the monthly distribution for at least two days. The monthly distribution is based on 30-year time series of daily temperatures in the recent historical climate (1971-2000). Using the EuroHEAT workflow is recommended because it utilizes data from multiple regional climate models to provide more reliable results, whereas the Xclim workflow relies on only one regional model.
Xclim project defines a heatwave based on user-defined absolute temperature thresholds for the maximum and minimum daily temperatures (i.e. day and night temperatures), and a minimum time duration (e.g. 2 or 3 days). Using absolute thresholds for temperature requires input in terms of temperature thresholds, which are typically specific to a region and based on expected health impacts.
We use the climate scenarios RCP4.5 (medium) and RCP8.5 (extreme) to compare the effect of different climate scenarios (more about RCPs).
As a result of the hazard assessment, we can obtain information about the heatwave frequency of occurrence in the reference period of 1971-2000 and three future periods: 2011-2040, 2041-2070 and 2071-2100. This result is based on model data for climate projections.
Source datasets in this workflow#
Xclim methodology in this workflow uses the EURO-CORDEX data.
Heatwave data prepared by the EuroHEAT project is directly available from the dedicated dataset on the Copernicus Data Store. This data is also based on EURO-CORDEX data.
Both methodologies are thus based on the EURO-CORDEX climate projections data. Please note that the resolution of this data is 12x12km, and it is not suitable for accurately evaluating heat wave risks inside cities, because the dataset does not take into account the urban heat-island effect.
Risk assessment methodology based on EuroHEAT climate projections at the regional level#
The results of this workflow provide insights into the relative changes in heatwave occurrence based on the EuroHEAT climate projections data, the distribution of vulnerable population groups (Worldpop), and the projected heatwave risk for these vulnerable groups.
These findings help to better understand the projected magnitude of change in heatwave occurrence and highlight areas with a higher concentration of vulnerable population groups. Additionally, this workflow demonstrates the methodology for combining these two sets of information using a 10x10 risk matrix.
It is important to note that the level of risk is dependent on the area selected at the beginning of the analysis. This means that the risk level only reflects differences between the chosen regions.
Structure of the workflow#
This workflow consists of several parts, where the user is guided in performing a risk assessment for heat waves. Separate notebooks are available for the two methods of heat wave hazard estimation, followed by notebooks for estimating the level of risk to the population based on satellite data (local level), and the level of risk to the population based on the EuroHEAT data (regional level).
Outputs of the workflow#
The heatwave hazard workflow gives you the information about the heatwave occurrence at a yearly temporal resolution, with the reference period of 1971-2000 and future periods of 2011-2040, 2041-2070, and 2071-2100 under two climate scenarios: RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. This workflow allows you to modify the temperature and duration thresholds that specify the heatwave events according to your needs, you can define which thresholds are best suited for your region. The results provide you the information on how often you can expect heatwaves in the future. The duration of the heatwaves (in days) is also important to estimate possible heatwave events severity.
The risk assessment at the regional level provides information about the projected heatwave occurrence changes for the near and further future with the combination of the distribution of the vulnerable groups at the regional level.